Lead Conversion Analyzer
Inquiry → qualified → consult → booked. Plug your numbers; we show you which step is bleeding patients to competitors.
What you get
Funnel waterfall · leak analysis · top fix recommendations
⏱ 3 minutes✓ Free · no card
Tell us where to send it.
Request the lead conversion analyzer.
How it works
Three steps, no guesswork.
- Step 01
Inputs
Monthly inquiries · qualified · consults · booked · patient value
- Step 02
Processing
We run our healthcare model on what you send and a strategist takes you through the result — nothing is generated automatically.
- Step 03
Output
Waterfall chart · drop-off rates · benchmark vs healthcare median
Keep going
More healthcare tools.
Beyond the calculator
What the engagement actually delivers.
Items marked “mockup” are AI-staged presentations of real artwork.
Want the human version?
30 minutes with a strategist.
Tools are great for benchmarking. For your situation, the conversation is faster. No pitch.
- A 30-minute call with a healthcare specialist
- Your top three growth opportunities, in writing
- Honest advice — even if that means not hiring us
- No obligation and no hard sell
Consultations are hosted by Arush Thapar’s team.
What do you want to improve first?
Practical notes & supporting evidence
More detail for your next decision.
PrepareMonthly inquiries · qualified · consults · booked · patient value
InspectWaterfall chart · drop-off rates · benchmark vs healthcare median
ValidateCheck the assumptions against your source records
Working with the lead conversion analyzer
Inquiry → qualified → consult → booked. Plug your numbers; we show you which step is bleeding patients to competitors. The published input requirements are Monthly inquiries · qualified · consults · booked · patient value. The output is described as Waterfall chart · drop-off rates · benchmark vs healthcare median. Prepare those inputs from records with an explicit reporting period. If you do not have the required information, document the missing input before interpreting the result.
The tool is categorised as a analyzer. The page provides a request route for the described resource; a request is different from an instant automated assessment. The deliverable is described as Funnel waterfall · leak analysis · top fix recommendations. Keep that description alongside the result so readers understand what the tool was designed to produce.
Design the website around a real patient task
Start with the task a visitor needs to complete. Finding a treatment, checking a clinician’s background, identifying a location and asking for an appointment are related tasks, but they need different information. Make those paths visible in the navigation and on the relevant service pages. A good brief includes the content and the operational destination of each action: who receives the form, what happens after submission and how a visitor obtains help when the first contact route fails.
Desktop screens help explain page hierarchy, but they cannot establish the quality of the mobile experience. Check readable text, tap targets, menu behaviour and form validation on a phone. Long doctor biographies and treatment descriptions should remain easy to scan without hiding important details in decorative interactions. When a collection shows both desktop and mobile artwork, compare the priority of information across them. The mobile layout should preserve useful content rather than simply shrink the desktop composition.
From visual approval to a checked release
A launch review should cover content ownership, approved contact information, working forms, redirects and the URLs that search engines are expected to index. If a site replaces an existing website, map important old pages to appropriate new destinations. Check titles, descriptions, canonicals and internal links against the actual released URLs. Keep the review list separate from the visual approval: a polished mockup does not prove that a live booking form, analytics event or redirect behaves correctly.
Document the difference between a design study, a delivered website and a live capture. A design study explains a proposed experience. A live capture records what the site looked like when it was captured. Neither alone establishes an improvement in appointment conversion. For an outcome comparison, use a defined period and consistent event definitions, then reconcile digital enquiries with attended appointments where the practice can do so. Performance and accessibility checks should be repeatable after future content edits, not only at the first launch.
