Independent studio work across healthcare websites, campaigns and brand systems. Explore our client case studies for commissioned projects.
Apollo · Campaign portfolioAI-staged portfolio mockup · Based on existing artwork
Brand systems & guidelines
From identity to everyday use.
Our internal studio brand and original healthcare identities across mental wellbeing, rehabilitation, paediatrics, senior care and dermatology. Explore the wordmarks, colour systems, stationery and six-page downloadable guidelines.
Make healthcare brands easier to recognise, understand and choose. Explore the identity, colour palette, typography, applications and downloadable brand guidelines.
A quieter first step into a conversation about wellbeing. Explore the identity, colour palette, typography, applications and downloadable brand guidelines.
An identity that brings purposeful movement into everyday life. Explore the identity, colour palette, typography, applications and downloadable brand guidelines.
A friendly first impression for children and the people who care for them. Explore the identity, colour palette, typography, applications and downloadable brand guidelines.
A familiar, dignified identity for care that comes home. Explore the identity, colour palette, typography, applications and downloadable brand guidelines.
A considered identity that gives skin-care information room to breathe. Explore the identity, colour palette, typography, applications and downloadable brand guidelines.
Selected work
Brand identity & print: the collection.
Open any project for the full artwork, the brief and the design decisions behind it.
Published by Branding Pioneers · Published page information and practical marketing guidance
A practical reference for this page
01
Start hereBrand identity print .
02
Establish contextUse the published scope and relevant source material
03
Choose the next stepFollow the linked resource and assign an owner
What the brand identity & print collection contains
Healthcare identities carried through stationery, brochures and physical materials. This collection brings together 16 published projects. Examples include Branding Pioneers — brand system & guidelines; Serein — brand system & guidelines; Fieldwork — brand system & guidelines; Little Orbit — brand system & guidelines; Stillwater — brand system & guidelines. Each project has its own description, brief and design decisions, so you can move from the category overview to the individual work that most closely matches your next task.
The collection includes material labelled by its actual status. Keep independent studio concepts and workflow artwork identified when preparing a reference deck. For brand identity & print, compare the message, format and intended action across the examples before choosing a direction. The linked service page explains the wider delivery context, while the individual project pages let you inspect the visual decisions in detail.
Use the portfolio as a project brief
Look first at the problem the collection addresses and the deliverables it actually contains. A website study can explain navigation and information hierarchy. A campaign collection can demonstrate how a message moves through different formats. Identity materials can show consistency across print and digital applications. These are useful design references, but each answers a different question. Choose the example closest to your intended task, then identify the parts you want to explore further rather than requesting a copy of the whole collection.
Write a brief that names your provider, audience, services, existing brand constraints and the action the work should support. Include content ownership and the practical destination of contact requests. When several stakeholders approve the work, agree who has the final decision on medical information, design and operational details. The clearer those responsibilities are, the easier it becomes to review a proposed layout without repeatedly changing the underlying service description or appointment process.
What to check when reviewing the artwork
Read the collection at its intended size. Check whether the provider and message remain recognisable, whether supporting copy is legible and whether the next action is easy to understand. Look for consistent terminology across individual pieces. For multilingual work, have the wording reviewed by someone who understands the language and the service context. A translated message can change length, reading order and emphasis, so the layout needs its own review rather than an automatic text replacement.
Keep the distinction between independent studio concepts, client deliverables and editorial workflow artwork visible. Concepts explore possible design approaches. Client collections show the materials or engagement scope identified on their pages. Workflow artwork explains a process visually. None of these categories should be presented as an unverified client result. For a new project, confirm the release checklist and measurement plan separately from design approval, and make sure the source files and approval notes remain available to the team responsible for future updates.
Choose the resource that matches your next decision
Begin with the question you need to answer, then choose the most appropriate destination in this collection. A guide explains a method, a checklist supports a repeatable review, a calculator explores assumptions and a case file documents a particular engagement. Reading them as interchangeable resources can create confusion. If you need to brief a supplier, start with the relevant service or framework. If you need to assess evidence, start with the source reports and the limits stated alongside the example.
Use the collection to narrow the investigation rather than adding every possible task to a marketing plan. Identify the stage where progress is blocked: discovery, understanding the service, making contact, arranging an appointment or following up. Choose a resource that addresses that stage and keep a short note of the evidence you need. A focused review is easier to act on than a long list of unrelated recommendations, particularly when clinical approvals and operational changes involve different people.