You Are Being Reviewed Right Now. On Platforms You Might Not Even Know About.
A patient left your clinic 2 hours ago. They are sitting in traffic, phone in hand, and typing a review about their experience. It might be on Google. It might be on Practo. It could be on Justdial, Facebook, or a Reddit thread titled "Best dermatologists in Bangalore — my experience."
Most healthcare practices monitor Google reviews. Some check Practo. Almost none have visibility into the full landscape of places where patients talk about them. And that is a problem, because a 1-star review on an obscure platform can show up on page one of Google when someone searches your name.
Review management is not just about Google anymore. It is about having a system that captures every mention, across every platform, and responds appropriately — before a bad review calcifies into a permanent reputation stain.
The Review Landscape: Where Patients Talk About You
Tier 1: Direct Impact on Patient Decisions (Monitor Daily)
Google Business Profile reviews — visible in search results, Google Maps, and the local pack. This is where the majority of your reputation impact lives.
Practo reviews (India) — the largest healthcare-specific review platform. Many patients check Practo alongside Google.
Healthgrades / Zocdoc (US) — show up prominently in Google results for doctor-name searches.
Tier 2: Moderate Impact (Monitor Weekly)
Facebook Recommendations — visible when friends ask for doctor recommendations. Less search-visible but high trust among peer networks.
Justdial and Sulekha (India) — older platforms with declining traffic but still indexed by Google.
Yelp (US) — strong in some markets, irrelevant in others. Check your city.
Tier 3: Indirect Impact (Monitor Monthly)
Reddit / Quora threads — patients share detailed experiences in threads about medical conditions. These threads rank well in Google and influence decisions.
Twitter/X mentions — rare for individual practices but can amplify negative experiences rapidly.
Healthcare forums — condition-specific forums (fertility, cancer, mental health) where patients share provider experiences.
The Review Management System
Tool Setup
You need a single dashboard that aggregates reviews from all platforms. Options:
Free approach: Set up Google Alerts for your practice name and your doctors' names. Check Practo and Healthgrades manually twice per week. Use Facebook notifications for page reviews.
Paid tools (recommended for multi-location practices):
- Birdeye, Podium, or ReviewTrackers: aggregate reviews from 50+ platforms, send alerts, provide response templates, and track sentiment over time
- Cost: 5,000-25,000/month depending on locations and features
- ROI: the time saved on manual monitoring alone justifies the cost for any practice with 3+ locations
The Response Matrix
Not every review needs the same response style. Here is the framework:
| Review Type | Response Time | Who Responds | Response Length |
|---|
| 5-star positive | Within 48 hours | Front desk or marketing | 2-3 sentences, personalized |
| 4-star positive with feedback | Within 24 hours | Practice manager | 3-4 sentences, acknowledge the suggestion |
| 3-star mixed | Within 12 hours | Practice manager | 4-5 sentences, address concerns, offer offline discussion |
| 2-star negative | Within 6 hours | Practice manager + doctor awareness | 4-6 sentences, empathetic, move offline |
| 1-star very negative | Within 4 hours | Practice manager + senior leadership awareness | 5-7 sentences, serious tone, immediate offline action |
| Fake/spam | Within 24 hours | Marketing team | Brief factual response + flag for removal |
Response Templates (Starting Points — Always Customize)
5-star positive: "Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We're glad the team could help." (Keep replies generic: never confirm that the reviewer is a patient or mention their care.)
3-star mixed: "Thank you for your honest feedback, [Name]. We are happy to hear [positive aspect they mentioned]. Regarding [concern], we appreciate you bringing this to our attention. We are always looking for ways to improve. If you would like to discuss further, please contact [name] at [number]. We value your input."
1-star negative: "[Name], we are sorry to hear about your experience. This does not reflect the standard of care we strive to provide. We take your concerns seriously and would like to understand what happened so we can improve. Please contact [Patient Relations Manager name] directly at [number] or [email] at your earliest convenience. We want to make this right."
Always customize. Reference something specific from the review. Template responses are obvious and communicate the opposite of care.
Sentiment Analysis: Tracking Your Reputation Over Time
Responding to individual reviews is reactive. Sentiment analysis is proactive.
Track these metrics monthly:
Overall sentiment score. What percentage of reviews are positive (4-5 stars), neutral (3 stars), or negative (1-2 stars)? Plot the trend line.
Recurring themes. Use review text to identify patterns. If "wait time" appears in 15 percent of negative reviews, that is an operational priority. If "Dr. Patel" appears in 40 percent of positive reviews, that is a branding opportunity.
Platform distribution. Which platforms are getting the most reviews? Make sure your profile on each one is complete and accurate, so patients who choose to review you there find the right listing.
Response rate. What percentage of reviews received a response? Target 100 percent for all reviews 3 stars and below, and 80 percent+ for positive reviews.
Rating trend. Is your average rating improving, stable, or declining? A declining trend (even from 4.5 to 4.3) needs immediate intervention — investigate what is causing the negative shift and fix it, rather than trying to dilute it with a review drive.
Using Reviews Without Turning Them Into Testimonials
Reviews used to be our favourite marketing raw material: testimonial pages built from Google and Practo reviews, star ratings in ad copy, quote cards on Instagram. For Indian doctors and hospitals, that playbook ended on 6 October 2026. The National Medical Commission's guidelines say a doctor "shall not request or share patient testimonials, recommendations, endorsements or reviews for professional promotion on social media" (Explanation V to para 3.2), and that patient consent does not make a testimonial permissible (para 6.2). Our NMC guidelines hub covers the detail.
What reviews are still good for:
Operations. Recurring themes in reviews are the most honest audit of your patient experience you will ever get. Wait times, billing, phone handling and discharge instructions are fixable, and fixing them is what moves a rating.
Letting the platforms do the displaying. Google, Practo and the other platforms show your reviews to the people searching for you. You don't need to republish them; keep your profiles accurate and reply to every review.
Replying well. A courteous, privacy-safe reply is visible to every prospective patient and is not promotion.
What to stop in India: testimonial pages built from reviews, quoted reviews or star ratings in ads, review quote cards on social media, and "scan to read our reviews" prompts on brochures and signage.
Outside India the position differs. In the US and UK, republishing genuine reviews is generally allowed with conditions (genuine, not misleadingly edited, and in the UK held with permission); in Australia, AHPRA bars using reviews about clinical aspects in advertising.
The Negative Review Recovery Process
When a genuinely negative experience leads to a bad review, the goal is not removal. It is resolution — and ideally, an updated review.
Step 1: Respond publicly within hours. Empathetic, non-defensive, move offline.
Step 2: Contact the patient directly. Call or message personally. Listen to their full complaint without interruption. Apologize for their experience (not for clinical decisions — for the experience).
Step 3: Fix the problem. If the complaint is about wait times, billing, staff behavior, or communication — fix it. If it is about a clinical outcome, route to the appropriate medical review process.
Step 4: Follow up. After the issue is resolved, contact the patient one more time to check that it stayed resolved. Don't ask them to change their review; in India, requesting reviews is exactly what Explanation V to para 3.2 of the NMC guidelines rules out for doctors.
Some patients who go through this process will update their review of their own accord — sometimes from 1 star to 4 stars. A 1-star review that becomes a 4-star review with a note saying "The hospital contacted me and resolved the issue" is actually more powerful for your reputation than a straightforward 5-star review. It shows prospective patients that you care enough to fix problems.
Set Up Your Review Management System — Free Consultation →
Filed underpatient reviews managementmanage healthcare reviewshospital review managementpatient feedback systemhealthcare online reviews
About the author
Nishu Sharma
Founder & CEO · Gurugram, India
Nishu founded Branding Pioneers in 2016 with one rule that hasn't changed since: healthcare only. She'd run digital strategy at a top-10 Indian agency and watched generalist marketing underserve medical clients who needed something built for how patients actually search and decide. So she left to build the specialist instead. It's now an 80-person team working with healthcare brands worldwide.
Free guide · 17 pages
The Patient Acquisition Blueprint
A 90-day plan from first search to booked appointment.
